Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Breast Cancer: Correlations with Prognostic Factors

´ëÇÑ¿µ»óÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 80±Ç 2È£ p.318 ~ 332
À̸íÀº, ±è¼ºÇå, °­ºÀÁÖ, ÀÌ¿¬ÁÖ, ±èÀ±ÁÖ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̸íÀº ( Lee Myoung-Eun ) 
Catholic University College of Medicine St. Vincent¡¯s Hospital Department of Radiology

±è¼ºÇå ( Kim Sung-Hun ) 
Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Radiology
°­ºÀÁÖ ( Kang Bong-Joo ) 
Catholic University College of Medicine Seoul St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Radiology
ÀÌ¿¬ÁÖ ( Lee Youn-Joo ) 
Catholic University College of Medicine Daejeon St. Mary¡¯s Hospital Department of Radiology
±èÀ±ÁÖ ( Kim Yun-Ju ) 
National Cancer Center Department of Radiology

Abstract


Purpose: To correlate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with prognostic factors of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods: 24 breast cancer patients were evaluated with CEUS. As a quantitative analysis, the peak enhancement (PE), wash-in and wash-out area under curve (WiWoAUC), wash-in rate (WiR) and wash-out rate, rise time, fall time, mean transit time, time to peak, and wash-in perfusion index (WiPI) were measured. As a qualitative analysis, the enhancement patterns were evaluated. Pathologic prognostic factors, including histologic grade, hormonal receptors and Ki-67 proliferative index were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Correlation of quantitative and qualitative parameters of CEUS with prognostic factors was assessed.

Results: We found that the quantitative CEUS values (PE, WiWoAUC, and WiPI) of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer were higher than those of ER negative counterpart (all p < 0.05). Lower quantitative CEUS values (PE, WiWoAUC, WiR, and WiPI) were found in triple-negative cancer (TNC) than those of non-TNC (all p < 0.05). No CEUS parameter showed significant difference in distinguishing histologic grade (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The CEUS parameters were helpful in predicting prognostic factors, such as ER positivity or triple negativity. However, they could not predict the histologic grade.

Å°¿öµå

Breast Neoplasms; Ultrasonography; Prognosis; Receptors, Progesterone; Receptors, Estrogen; Immunohistochemistry

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS