Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú ÈÄ ½Ã°£ÀÇ È帧¿¡ µû¸¥ Æó ½ÇÁúÀÇ Àü»ê´ÜÃþÈ­ÃÔ¿µ ¼Ò°ß º¯È­¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ Computed Tomographic Features of Lung Parenchyma Over Time after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

´ëÇÑ¿µ»óÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 80±Ç 4È£ p.740 ~ 749
·ùÇö¹Ì, À¯Áø¿µ, ±è¼ºÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
·ùÇö¹Ì ( Ryu Hyeon-Mi ) 
ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú

À¯Áø¿µ ( Yoo Jin-Young ) 
ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
±è¼ºÁø ( Kim Sung-Jin ) 
ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú ÈÄ ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³²¿¡ µû¸¥ Æó ½ÇÁúÀÇ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ ¼Ò°ßÀÇ º¯È­ ¾ç»óÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ°íÀÚ ½ÃÀ۵Ǿú´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: ½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú ÈÄ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀ» ÇÑ 72¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÀÚ¹ß ¼øȯ ȸº¹ºÎÅÍ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µÀ» Çϱâ±îÁö °É¸° ½Ã°£ÀÇ Áß¾Ó°ªÀÌ 1½Ã°£ 3ºÐÀ̹ǷÎ, ÀÚ¹ß ¼øȯ ȸº¹ºÎÅÍ Àü»êÈ­´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ±îÁö °É¸° ½Ã°£À» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î 1½Ã°£ ÀÌÇÏÀÎ ±×·ì(±×·ì1)°ú 1½Ã°£ ÃÊ°úÀÎ ±×·ì(±×·ì2) µÎ ±×·ìÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾î °¢ ±×·ìÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: µÎ ±×·ì¿¡´Â °¢°¢ 36¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ°¡ ¼ÓÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇؼ­ µÎ ±×·ìÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ÃÑ 7°¡Áö ¿µ»óÀÇÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¸ÕÀú ±×·ì 1¿¡¼­´Â ³óµµ °æ»ç(gradient, p = 0.010)¿Í ¼Ò¿±¼º ³óµµ °æ»ç(lobular gradient, p = 0.017)°¡ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ±×·ì 2º¸´Ù ¸¹¾Ò´Ù. ±× ¿Ü üÀ§ ÀÇÁ¸ À½¿µ(dependent density, p = 0.010)°ú ¼Ò¿±¼º °æÈ­(lobular consolidation, p = 0.010)´Â Åë°èÇÐÀû ºÐ¼®À¸·Î ÅëÇØ ±×·ì 2¿¡¼­ À¯ÀǹÌÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. À½¿µÀÇ ºÐÆ÷´Â ±×·ì 1¿¡¼­ ¹Ì¸¸¼º(p = 0.000) ±×¸®°í »óºÎ(p = 0.032)¿¡ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç º¯¿¬ºÎ º¸Á¸(sparing peripheral portion, p = 0.000)Àº ±×·ì 1¿¡¼­ ´õ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

°á·Ð: ³óµµ °æ»ç¿Í ¼Ò¿±¼º °æ»ç´Â ÀÚ¹ß ¼øȯ ȸº¹ ÈÄ ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³²¿¡ µû¶ó »ç¶óÁö´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. À½¿µÀÇ ºÐÆ÷´Â ¹Ì¸¸¼º, »óºÎ, ±×¸®°í º¯¿¬ºÎ º¸Á¸ÀÌ ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³¯¼ö·Ï »ç¶óÁö´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ¹Ý¸é üÀ§ ÀÇÁ¸ À½¿µ°ú ¼Ò¿±¼º °æÈ­´Â ½Ã°£ÀÌ Áö³¯¼ö·Ï ´õ Áõ°¡ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.

Purpose: To identify the key CT features of lung parenchyma over time after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

Materials and Methods: In total, 72 patients underwent CT after CPR. Because the median time from return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to CT was 1 h 3 min, we divided patients into two groups: ¡Â 1 h (group 1) and > 1 h (group 2), based on the ROSC to CT time. We analyzed and compared various lung parenchymal CT findings between groups.

Results: Each group included 36 patients. Using statistical analysis, we identified seven statistically significant imaging features. Gradient (p = 0.010), lobular gradient (p = 0.017), diffuse pattern (p = 0.000), upper distribution (p = 0.032), and peripheral portion sparing (p = 0.000) were more common in group 1 than in group 2. Dependent density (p = 0.010) and lobular consolidation (p = 0.010) were more common in group 2 than in group 1.

Conclusion: The gradient and lobular gradient tended to disappear over time after ROSC. In terms of distribution, a diffuse pattern with upper predominance and peripheral portion sparing tended to disappear over time. However, the dependent density and lobular consolidation tended to increase over time in the lung parenchyma after CPR.

Å°¿öµå

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Tomography; Lung

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS