Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿°ÀÇ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ß Various MRI Findings of Toxocara canis Myelitis

´ëÇÑ¿µ»óÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 81±Ç 1È£ p.135 ~ 146
¹Ú¼±¿µ, ¹Ú°æ¼®, ÀÌ¿µÁØ, ÀÌÁØ¿ì, ¹èÀ±Á¤, °­À¯¼±, ¾ÈÁ߸ð, °­Èï½Ä,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Ú¼±¿µ ( Park Sun-Young ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú

¹Ú°æ¼® ( Park Kyung-Seok ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ½Å°æ°ú
ÀÌ¿µÁØ ( Lee Eu-Gene ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
ÀÌÁØ¿ì ( Lee Joon-Woo ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
¹èÀ±Á¤ ( Bae Yun-Jung ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
°­À¯¼± ( Kang Yu-Suhn ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
¾ÈÁ߸ð ( Ahn Joong-Mo ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú
°­Èï½Ä ( Kang Heung-Sik ) 
ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú

Abstract

¸ñÀû: °³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿°ÀÇ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó 10¿¹¸¦ º¸°íÇÏ°í, °³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿° Áø´Ü¿¡ µµ¿òÀÌ µÇ´Â ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: 2015³â 6¿ùºÎÅÍ 2018³â 3¿ù±îÁö º»¿ø¿¡¼­ °³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿°À¸·Î Áø´Ü¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Àǹ«±â·Ï°ú ÃÔ¿µÇÑ Ã´Ãß ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» ôÃß¿µ»ó Àü¹®ÀÇ 1¸í°ú ¿µ»óÀÇÇаú Àü°øÀÇ 1¸íÀÌ ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: º» ¿¬±¸´Â °³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿°ÀÇ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» ´ÙÀ½ µÎ °¡Áö·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¸ÕÀú type 1Àº Ãà»ó¸é¿¡¼­ Á߽ɺÎ, ¹Ì¸¸¼º T2 °í½ÅÈ£°­µµ°¡ º¸ÀÌ´Â °æ¿ì·Î 50%°¡ ÇØ´çµÇ¸ç ¸ðµç ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ º´º¯ÀÇ ¶Ñ·ÇÇÑ Á¶¿µÁõ°­ÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ °æ¿ì(4¿¹, 80%)¿¡¼­ ÈÄ¿ÜÃø ¶Ç´Â ÈĹæÀÇ °áÀý¼º Á¶¿µÁõ°­À» º¸¿´´Ù. Type 2´Â ÈÄ¿ÜÃø ȤÀº ÈĹ濡¼­ ½û±â ¸ð¾ç ¶Ç´Â ±¹¼ÒÀû T2 °í½ÅÈ£°­µµÀÇ º´º¯ÀÌ º¸ÀÌ´Â °æ¿ì·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, 50%¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ °æ¿ì º´º¯ÀÇ ¹üÀ§°¡ »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÛ¾Ò°í Á¶¿µÁõ°­Àº 1¿¹¿¡¼­¸¸ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: °³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿°ÀÇ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»óÀÌ ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¼Ò°ßÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³¯ ¼ö ÀÖÀ½À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´°í À̸¦ ÅëÇØ °³È¸Ãæ ô¼ö¿°ÀÇ ÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» 2°¡Áö·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© Á¦½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Purpose: To describe magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in 10 cases of Toxocara canis myelitis and to analyze these findings to aid in the diagnosis of this condition.

Materials and Methods: From June 2015 to March 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the electronic medical records and MR images of patients who were diagnosed with Toxocara canis myelitis. The analysis of the MR images was based on a discussion between an experienced spinal radiologist and a radiology resident.

Results: This study classified MRI findings into the following two types. Type 1 was defined as central and diffuse T2 high signal intensity on the axial plane, which was observed in 50% of all cases. All lesions showed avid enhancement, mostly in the posterolateral or posterior region (4 cases, 80%). Type 2 was defined as wedge-shaped or focal T2 high signal intensity in the posterolateral or posterior region and corresponded to the remaining 50% of the cases. In this case, the extent of the lesion was relatively small and contrast enhancement was observed in only one case.

Conclusion: This study revealed that various imaging findings could be observed in cases of Toxocara canis myelitis, and the findings were classified into two types.

Å°¿öµå

Toxocara Canis; Myelitis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Spine

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed
KAMS