Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Big5 ¼º°ÝƯ¼º¿¡ µû¸¥ ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã È¿°ú Effects of Vision Training According to Big5 Personality Trait

´ëÇѽðúÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 21±Ç 1È£ p.99 ~ 115
ÀåÈñÁ¤, ÀÓÇö¼º,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀåÈñÁ¤ ( Jang Hee-Jeong ) 
À»Áö´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ¾È°æ±¤Çаú

ÀÓÇö¼º ( Leem Hyun-Sung ) 
À»Áö´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ¾È°æ±¤Çаú

Abstract

¸ñÀû : º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü, ÈÄÀÇ Big5 ¼º°Ý(¿ÜÇ⼺, ¿ìÈ£¼º, ¼º½Ç¼º, ½Å°æÁõ, °³¹æ¼º)ÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ¿Í ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·ÃÀÇ Çâ»óµµ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¹æ¹ý : ±³Á¤½Ã·Â 1.0 ÀÌ»óÀÇ 20´ë ¼ºÀÎ ³²³à 42¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü, ÈÄÀÇ ¾ç¾È½Ã°Ë»ç(Æ÷·ÓÅÍCV-5000, TOPCON, JAPANÀÌ¿ë)¿Í Big5 ¼º°Ý°Ë»ç(25¹®Ç× 5Á¡ ôµµ)¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ°í, ¾ç¾È½Ã ÀÌ»ó ºÐ·ù¿¡ µû¶ó °³Àκ° ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã µµ±¸(Bernell. USA)¸¦ ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿© ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·ÃÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú : Mogan¡¯s ±âÁØ ¹üÀ§³»±º°ú ¹üÀ§¿Ü±ºÀÇ ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü, ÈÄÀÇ Big5 ¼º°ÝÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, ¹üÀ§³»±º¿¡¼­ ¿ÜÇ⼺Àº ÆøÁÖ±ÙÁ¡(p=0.041), À¶ÇÕ¿ëÀ̼º(p=0.027), -100±×·¡µð¾ðÆ®(p=0.048)À¸·Î ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü º¸´Ù ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã ÈÄ ¿ÜÇ⼺ Á¡¼ö°¡ ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¿ìÈ£¼ºÀº ¿ø°Å¸®»çÀ§µµ(p=0.038), ¿ø°Å¸® À½¼ºÀ¶ÇÕ¹öÀü½º ȸº¹Á¡(p=0.010), ¿ø°Å¸® ¾ç¼ºÀ¶ÇÕ¹öÀü½º È帰Á¡(p=0.027), ¿ø°Å¸® ¾ç¼ºÀ¶ÇÕ¹öÀü½º ºÐ¸®Á¡(p=0.029), ±Ù°Å¸®»çÀ§µµ(p=0.025), ±×·¡µð¾ðÆ® AC/Aºñ(p=0.019), À¶ÇÕ¿ëÀ̼º(p=0.025), Á¶Àý·¢(p=0.019), ¿ì¾ÈÁ¶Àý·Â(p=0.003), Á¾ÈÁ¶Àý·Â(p=0.005), ¾ç¾ÈÁ¶Àý¿ëÀ̼º(p=0.012)À¸·Î ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü º¸´Ù ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã ÈÄ ¿ìÈ£¼º Á¡¼ö°¡ ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¹üÀ§¿Ü±º¿¡¼­´Â ¿ÜÇ⼺Àº ?100±×·¡µð¾ðÆ®(p=0.048)À¸·Î ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü º¸´Ù ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·ÃÈÄ ¿ÜÇ⼺ÀÇ Á¡¼ö°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. ¿ìÈ£¼ºÀº ÆøÁÖ±ÙÁ¡(p=0.045), ¿ø°Å¸® À½¼ºÀ¶ÇÕ¹öÀü½º ºÐ¸®Á¡(p=0.017), ¿ø°Å¸® ¾ç¼ºÀ¶ÇÕ¹öÀü½º ȸº¹Á¡(p=0.033), -100±×·¡µð¾ðÆ®(p=0.046), ±Ù°Å¸® À½¼ºÀ¶ÇÕ¹öÀü½º È帰Á¡(p=0.022), À½¼º»ó´ëÁ¶Àý·Â(p=0.026), ¾ç¼º»ó´ëÁ¶Àý·Â(p=0.006)À¸·Î ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü º¸´Ù ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã ÈÄ ¿ìÈ£¼º Á¡¼ö°¡ ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

°á·Ð : ¹üÀ§³»±º°ú ¹üÀ§¿Ü±º ¸ðµÎ ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã Àü º¸´Ù ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã ÈÄ ¿ìÈ£¼ºÀÌ ³ô¾ÆÁö´Â °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.

Purpose : This study was to evaluate the effect of vision training according to Big5 personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, openness) by examining the difference of each personality traits before and after the vision training.

Methods : Forty-two subjects of male and female adults in their twenties, with corrected vision above 1.0, volunteered for binocular vision test and Big5 personality trait test involving 25-questionnaire with 5-point scale before and after the vision training(with a phoroptor CV-5000, TOPCON, JAPAN), where vision training was followed by selecting personalized vision training tool(Bernell. USA) based on the classification of binocular abnormality of individuals.

Results : Based on Mogan's classification, the difference of the Big5 personality traits by before and after the vision training of inner group and outer group was analyzed. As a result of analysis, as for the inner group, extraversion is based on Near point of convergence, NPC(p=0.041), Fusional facility(p=0.027), -100 Gradient(p=0.048), all the scores of extraversion were significantly higher after vision training than before the training. Agreeableness is based on lateral Phoria(far)(p=0.038), Base-in, BI vergence recovery (far)(p=0.010), Base-out, BO vergence(far) blur(p=0.027), BO vergence(far) break(p=0.029), lateral phoria (Near)(p=0.025), -1.00 Gradient phoria(p=0.019), Fusional facility(p=0.025), fused cross cylinder (p=0.019), Push-up Oculus dexter, OD(p=0.003), Push-up Oculus sinister, OS(p=0.005), Binocular accommodative facility(p=0.012), all the scores of agreeableness were significantly higher after vision training than before vision training. As for the outer group, extraversion is based on -100 Gradient (p=0.048). It is the same score with the inner group and the score of extraversion was higher after vision training than before the training. Agreeableness is based on NPC(p=0.045), BI vergence break(ar) (p=0.017), BO vergence recovery(far)(p=0.033), -1.00 Gradient phoria(p=0.046), BI vergence recovery(near) (p=0.022), NRA(p=0.026), Positive relative accommodative, PRA(p=0.006), all the scores of agreeableness were significantly higher after vision training than before the training.

Conclusion : It is assured that agreeableness about all of the inner and outer group were higher after vision training than before the training.

Å°¿öµå

¿ìÈ£¼º; Big5 ¼º°Ý; ¹üÀ§³»±º; ¹üÀ§¿Ü±º; ½Ã±â´ÉÈÆ·Ã
Agreeableness; Big5 personality traits; Inner group; Outer group Vision training

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI