Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÎµî½Ã Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®ÀÇ ºñ±³ ºÐ¼® Comparative Analysis on Accommodative Response Based on Degree of Anisopia

´ëÇѽðúÇÐȸÁö 2020³â 22±Ç 1È£ p.75 ~ 81
µµÁ¾È¯, Á¶Àç¿ø, Á¤¿¹¸°, ¹ÚÇü¹Î, Ãߺ´¼±,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
µµÁ¾È¯ ( Do Jong-Hwan ) 
´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú

Á¶Àç¿ø ( Jo Jae-Won ) 
´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú
Á¤¿¹¸° ( Jung Yee-Rin ) 
´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú
¹ÚÇü¹Î ( Park Hyung-Min ) 
´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú
Ãߺ´¼± ( Chu Byoung-Sun ) 
´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú

Abstract

¸ñÀû : ºÎµî½Ã Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¹æ¹ý : ¾È°úÀû ¼ö¼úÀ̳ª ÁúȯÀÌ ¾ø°í ¾ç¾ÈÀÇ ³ª¾È ½Ã·ÂÀÌ Á¤½ÃÀ̸ç, ½Ã±â´ÉÀÌ µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ¼ºÀÎ ³²³à 10¸í(21.60¡¾0.50¼¼)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¾ç¾È ¸ðµÎ ³ªÀÎÀÎ »óÅÂ¿Í ºñ¿ì¼¼¾È¿¡ °¢°¢ +1.00, +1.50, +2.00 DÀÇ ÄÜÅÃÆ®·»Á Âø¿ëÇÑ ÈÄ Á¶ÀýÀڱط®À» 100, 40, 20 cm·Î ´Þ¸®ÇÏ¿© µ¿ÀûÃøÁ¤ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ °³¹æÇü ÀÚµ¿±¼Àý°Ë»ç±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú : Áֽ🮰¡ ª¾ÆÁú¼ö·Ï ¿ì¼¼¾È, ºñ¿ì¼¼¾È ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ºñ¿ì¼¼¾ÈÀÇ °æ¿ì ³ª¾ÈÀÏ ¶§ º¸´Ù ±Ù½Ã°¡ °­ÇØÁú¼ö·Ï Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®Àº °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ±×¿Í´Â ¹Ý´ë·Î ¿ì¼¼¾ÈÀÇ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®Àº Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù(p£¼0.050). µ¿ÀϰŸ®¿¡¼­ ºÎµî½Ã Á¤µµ¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¿ì¾ÈÀÇ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·® Â÷À̸¦ ºñ±³ÇÑ °á°ú ºÎµî½Ã Á¤µµ¿Í Á¶ÀýÀڱط®ÀÌ °¡Àå Ŭ ¶§ Á¿ì¾ÈÀÇ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®ÀÌ °¡Àå Å« °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p£¼0.050).

°á·Ð : º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °á°ú·Î ºÎµî½ÃÀÇ °¡ÀÔµµ ÃøÁ¤ ½Ã Á¿ì¾ÈÀÇ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ Á¤µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤¹ÐÇÑ °Ë»ç°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇϸç, ±Ù¿ë¾È°æÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡¼­´Â Á¿ì¾ÈÀÇ Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ·®ÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ °í·ÁÇÑ Ã³¹æÀÌ ±Ù°Å¸® ÀÛ¾÷À¸·Î ÀÎÇÑ Á¶Àý¼º ¾ÈÁ¤ÇǷθ¦ ÃÖ¼ÒÈ­ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

Purpose : This study aimed to compare each accommodative response based on degree of anisopia.

Methods : This study was performed with 10 adult males and females(21.60¡¾0.50 years old) under the criteria; 1) no subject had ophthalmic surgery or disease, 2) all subjects were within normal vision range and had no need to correct, and 3) all subjects had same visual functions. The contact lenses with +1.00, +1.50, and +2.00 D were monocularly worn on non-dominant eye one after the other. The accommodative responses were measured by a binocular open-field autorefractometer under the accommodative stimulus of 100, 40, and 20 cm that enabled dynamic measurement.

Results : As a viewing distance became shorter the accommodative response increased inboth dom inant and non-dominant eyes. For non-dominant eyes the accommodative response has decreased as the degree of myopia has become greater in comparison with the naked eyes, while for dominant eyes the accommodative response increased(p<0.050). When the anisopia degree and the accommodative stimulus were greater the accommodative response seemed to be bigger(p<0.050).

Conclusion : The results of this study revealed that a precise examination on accommodative response level of both eyes is required when prescribing addition for anisopia. Therefore, it is thought that the difference of accommodative responses between left and right eyes should be considered to minimize the accommodative asthenopia caused by close-range works for prescribing reading glasses.

Å°¿öµå

Á¶Àý¹ÝÀÀ; Á¶ÀýÀÚ±Ø; ºÎµî»ó½Ã; ºÎµî½Ã
Accommodative response; Accommodative stimulus; Aniseikonia; Anisopia

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI