Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Áøµ¿ ÀÚ±Ø À¯¹«¿¡ µû¸¥ È£Èí ÀúÇ× ÈÆ·Ã ½Ã Æó ±â´É°ú È£Èí±ÙÀÇ Áï°¢ÀûÀÎ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ÀÖÀ»±î? Is There Any Immediate Difference between Pulmonary Function and Respiratory Muscle, with or without Vibration Stimulation in Respiratory Resistance Training?

´ëÇѹ°¸®Ä¡·á°úÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 25±Ç 3È£ p.17 ~ 24
¹ÚÁø¿µ, ±è¿¹½½, ¹ÚÇöÁÖ, À̸í¸ð,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹ÚÁø¿µ ( Park Jin-Young ) 
´ëÀü´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú

±è¿¹½½ ( Kim Ye-Seul ) 
´ëÀü´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú
¹ÚÇöÁÖ ( Park Hyun-Ju ) 
´ëÀü´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú
À̸í¸ð ( Lee Myung-Mo ) 
´ëÀü´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of whole body vibration combined breathing resistance on lung capacity and respiratory muscle and to suggest a mediation method for improvement of respiratory function and lung function in the future.

Methods: This study was a preliminary study design of two groups of 54 healthy young adults who were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n=27) with core exercise combined with respiratory resistance and whole body vibration and a control group with respiratory resistance and core exercise (n=27). All interventions consisted of 6 core exercises every 40 seconds and rest for 20 seconds. To compare the effects of intervention, we measured spirometry and respiratory muscle strength.

Results: Both the experimental group and the control group showed a significant increase in Forced vital capacity (FVC) and Maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) (p<.05). However, FEV1 and FEV1% were significantly increase only in the experimental group (p<.05). FVC, FEV1%, Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP), Maximum Expiratory Pressure (MEP) showed more significant increase in the experimental group than the control group.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that whole-body vibration combined breathing resistance is an effective intervention for people, with FVC, FEV1%, MIP, MEP increase.

Å°¿öµå

Breathing exercise; Pulmonary function test; Vibration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI