Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àå¾Ö¹° ³Ñ±â Æ®·¹µå¹Ð º¸Çà ÈÆ·ÃÀÌ Æí¸¶ºñ ȯÀÚÀÇ Á¤Àû ¹× µ¿Àû ±ÕÇü ´É·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ Effects of Treadmill Gait Training with Obstacle-Crossing on Static and Dynamic Balance Ability in Patients with Post Stroke Hemiplegia

´ëÇѹ°¸®ÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 14±Ç 1È£ p.139 ~ 150
ÀÌÁöÀº, ÀÌÈ£¼º,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÁöÀº ( Lee Ji-Eun ) 
´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ¿îµ¿ÀÇ°úÇаú

ÀÌÈ£¼º ( Lee Ho-Seong ) 
´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø ¿îµ¿ÀÇ°úÇаú

Abstract


PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the effects of treadmill gait training with obstacle-crossing on the static and dynamic balance ability of patients with post stroke hemiplegia.

METHODS: Twenty-one patients with post stroke hemiplegia were divided into three groups as: treadmill gait training with obstacle-crossing (TOG, n=7), treadmill gait training without obstacle-crossing (TGG, n=7) and a control (CON, n=7). TOG and TGG performed exercise for 20 minutes, three times a week for 8 weeks. Static balance ability (stability typical, ST; weight distribution index, WDI; fourier harmony index, FHI; and fall index, FI) and dynamic balance ability (berg balance scale, BBS and timed up and go test, TUG) were measured before and after 8 -weeks in each exercise group. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures, a paired t-test, and multiple comparisons according to Tukey¡¯s HSD.

RESULTS: FHI and BBS were significantly increased at TOG (p<.01) and TGG (p<.05) after 8-weeks compared to before treadmill gait training with obstacle-crossing. FHI and BBS were significantly increased at TOG compared with CON and TGG (p<.05).

CONCLUSION: Treadmill gait training with obstaclecrossing was more effective than that without obstaclecrossing to improve posture control and independent daily life performance of hemiplegia patients.

Å°¿öµå

Dynamic balance; Hemiplegia; Obstacle crossing; Static balance; Treadmill gait

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI