Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ì£Ü¨Õá ݬûÜËþïÒÛö¿¡ μÇÑ æÚϼ A study of bivariate sign test

±¤ÁÖº¸°ÇÀü¹®´ëÇÐ³í¹®Áý 1994³â 19±Ç 1È£ p.177 ~ 185
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼ÛÁ¤/Song J

Abstract


We introduced several Bivariate Sign Tests by Hodges, Blumen and Lee in this paper.
In the bivariate normal distribution with mean vector ( ¥ì_¥ö , ¥ì_y ) and unit variance, we compared powers of some Bivariate Sign Tests to test null hypothesis H_0 against H_1 by changing the significance level ¥á with the correlation coefficient ¥ñ, Mahalanobis distance ¥Ä^2, and the direction of shift ¥è in alternative hypothesis.
Because Hotelling¢¥s ¥Ó^2 test has the same power under the same Mahalanobis distance ¥Ä^2, by changing the direction of shift in alternative hypothesis, there is a significance to compare the ¥Ó^2 test with other Bivariate Sign Tests.
As a result, Lee¢¥s Bivariate Sign Test is more poweful than other Bivariate Sign Tests when the direction of shift ¥è in alternative hypothesis is about 45?? for positive ¥ñ. But Lee¢¥s Bivariate Sign Test does not have a correlation with the significance level and number of samples. And Hodges Bivariate Sign Test has some strength when the significance level is high.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸