Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÁÖ°üÀýºÎ ô°ñ½Å°æº´Áõ¿¡¼­ ´ÜºÐÀý ½Å°æÀüµµ °Ë»ç¹ýµéÀÇ ºñ±³ Comparision of Short Nerve Conduction Studies at the Ulnar Neuropathy around Elbow

±èöÇö, º¯½Âµæ, À̾ç¼ö, ±èdzÅÃ, ¹Ú⿵,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èöÇö ( Kim Chul-Hyun ) 
°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇб³½Ç

º¯½Âµæ ( Byun Seung-Deuk ) 
°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇб³½Ç
À̾ç¼ö ( Lee Yang-Soo ) 
°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇб³½Ç
±èdzÅà( Kim Poong-Taek ) 
°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇб³½Ç
¹Ú⿵ ( Park Chang-Young ) 
°æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀçÈ°ÀÇÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Objectives: We compared sensitivity of 2 cm short segment nerve conduction study with other nerve conduction studies for diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy around elbow.

Methods: mong patients with cliniclal evidences of ulnar neuropathy around elbow, 56 arms of 34 males and 19 females were diagnosed as ulnal neuropathy around elbow using 1 cm short segment nerve conduction study(SSNCV). We retested them with 2 cm and 3 cm SSNCV, and conventional nerve conduction study and the diagnostic sensitivity of 2 cm SSNCV was compared with conventional, 3 cm and 1 cm SSNCV

Results: Among 56 arms, 26 arms(46%) were diagnosed as ulnar neuropathy around eldow by conventional nerve conduction study, 46 arms(82%) by 3 cm short segment nerve conduction study, and 1 cm SSNCV

Conclusion: The sensitivity of 2 cm SSNCV was comparable to the sensitivity of 1 cm SSNCV. The 2cm SSNCV would first be recommended for reducing the technical errors and saving time.

Å°¿öµå

Short segment nerve conduction study;sensitivity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KAMS